“Yes, we can strategize. It is an uphill battle as it does require going against the status quo (or at least much of the current status quo).
I believe we are moving in that direction and there are two forces that are allowing this move.
1. We are modelling permission to fail. Exploring next practices won’t land on the promising practice the first time. One of my best teaching examples of this was working with a project having students create persuasive videos. They did all the planning, scripting, and recording to a video camera. The last stage was to turn it into a newscast with iMovie. The computers were not cooperating so we tried for 2 blocks and then abandoned the plan. While they were disappointed, all of the learning goals had already been met.
2. Removing hurdles and empowering innovation. The directions we have moved in the District have a strong flavour of removing hurdles. At the same time, we are providing technology opportunities to explore new technology. We have provided loaner equipment for several years. My experience is that once schools dig in and see personally the potential in the classroom, it is just a matter of getting the resources that live in the school to allow further innovation. One of the best moves from the Maine 1 to 1 laptop project was to provide teachers the laptops 1 year before the students. In Surrey we have used a similar model by providing the iPads to teachers 4 months before schools.
Can we strategize innovation? Yes.
Are we strategizing innovation? Yes.
Does strategizing require continuous energy to keep it in motion? Yes.
Is the work worth it? Yes.
Has a portion of the status quo moved? Yes.”
The above is a guest post from Kevin Amboe (@amboe_k), Information Media Literacy Helping Teacher with School District #36. He writes in response to the question in an earlier post that asked the question: Can we strategize innovation?